Skip to main content

No more excuses: tackling inequalities in health and care professional regulation

Image for chapter 2 of the safer care for all report with diverse hands touching on purple background

Continuing the conversation: write-ups of recent events


The role of health professionals in tackling health inequalities: 14 December 2023

In Safer care for all, we looked at the impact of inequalities on patients, service users and registrants, and on public confidence more widely. We also took a closer look at what professional regulation (and beyond) could do to tackle inequalities in health and care. More than 90 participants joined us online to explore whether health and care professionals in the UK should have an explicit responsibility in supporting action to address these disparities as they do in other countries. And, if so, whether regulators need to reinforce such a role through their training, standards and guidance.

The event was attended by colleagues from the NHS, patient organisations, professional bodies, regulators and employer bodies.

With an early start to ensure that delegates could listen to speakers from the Medical Council of New Zealand (where it was much later on in the day) on the Council’s experience of embedding cultural safety for medical professionals in New Zealand, the event heard from a range of excellent speakers also including the NHS Race and Health Observatory, Healthwatch England to talk about the impact of health inequalities on patients and service users, the NHS Confederation on their five-step plan for NHS Trusts in tackling health inequalities, The Health and Care Professions Council on how they have sought to embed EDI considerations into their standards for registrants and the Royal College of Midwives on their work to decolonise midwifery education and training.    

The event was well attended with about 90 participants, including colleagues from the NHS, patient organisations, professional bodies, regulators and employer bodies to discuss how to tackle health inequities and consider what further actions should be taken. As well as the presentations there was some excellent discussions looking at the balance between carrot and stick in encouraging a more active role by healthcare professionals in tackling health inequalities, the importance of education and training in embedding expectations, the need for strong leadership by all organisations, the importance of listening closely to what patients and service users are telling us and the value of unity in tackling shared problems.

We are also hoping to interview Joan Simeon from the Medical Council of New Zealand and will provide more details on our social media channels.


  • Why are black women four times more likely than white women to die in childbirth in the UK?
  • Why have four of the most recent major patient safety scandals primarily affected women?
  • Why are black and ethnic minoritised doctors overrepresented in all stages of the fitness to practise process?

These are just some of the stark statistics taken from the first chapter of our report Safer care for all where we look at the impact of inequalities on patients, service users and registrants, and on public confidence more widely. As part of this chapter, we also taker a closer look at what professional regulation (and beyond) can do to tackle inequalities affecting registrants and patients and service users.

 

 


Barriers to complaints: 23 January 2024

We started the new year off with our joint online seminar on tackling barriers to complaints with the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO). The event followed on the heels of an earlier in-person event with patient and service-user organisations held in Edinburgh in September 2023. 

The event brought together over 100 stakeholders from across the health and social care sector to discuss and explore the barriers that currently existing and can prevent patients and service uses from complaining. Along with our PHSO colleagues we wanted to share examples of innovative actions to widen and improve access to complaints services and to encourage and promote further joint work to tackle barriers to complaining. 

The event included speakers from National Voices and Healthwatch England who set the scene about the context for understanding the patient experience of making complaints and what patients want from complaints systems in the future. Attendees then went into themed breakout sessions to discuss particular types of barriers to complaining and possible short, medium and long term actions which could help to improve the experience of making complaints as well as the use complaints information is put to within the system to promote learning and improvement.

There were strong themes linking to the previous event looking at addressing health inequalities – it was clear that it isn’t possible to effectively address differential experiences in people’s access to and quality of care unless we know the problems they are encountering. Also, although the complaints system is complex and there are differences across organisations, there are clearly many shared barriers which could be tackle through collaborative action.   

Overall, it was a lively and useful event which has given us a lot to think about in terms of further action the PSA takes forward in this area during 2024/25 in line with our commitments in Safer care for all.


Find out more


What would you like to read? We have several versions available. You can download:

There is also a Welsh translation available of front part of the report, including The essentials and the executive summary. You can download it here

Please get in touch (via the email address below) with us if you would like a Word version of the full report.

Read our blogs

Read guest blogs on the main themes covered in Safer care for all:

Race inequality in health and care. Who’s responsible?

by Sam Rodger, Assistant Director, Policy and Strategy, NHS Race and Health Observatory | Jan 25, 2023

Our report Safer care for all  launched at a Parliamentary reception on 6 September 2022. It highlights some of the biggest challenges affecting the quality and safety of health and social care across the UK today.

With the publication of Safer care for all, we started a debate on the issues highlighted in the report and the recommendations we put forward. As part of this debate, we are publishing a series of guest blogs written by stakeholders from across the sector. This blog is from Sam Rodger, Assistant Director, Policy and Strategy at the NHS Race and Health Observatory.


The NHS is for everyone, we are told. This is the promise of our most treasured national institution. The very first principle of the NHS constitution sets out a commitment to provide a comprehensive service, available to all, irrespective of a person’s protected characteristics. More than that, the NHS constitution outlines a “wider social duty to promote equality” through the services it provides. So, whose job is it to make this a reality?

 

Everybody’s job

The answer we often hear is that it’s everyone’s job. We’re told that considerations about racial and ethnic equality should be a ‘golden thread’ embedded in all discussions about healthcare. We are told that every policy decision should be underwritten by an Equality Impact Assessment. We are told that every member of staff in the NHS, from the CEO to each and every clinician, should be mindful of potential health inequalities, and should work to eliminate them where they find them.

This means each GP and practice manager should be thinking about ethnic health inequalities in their local population, and that individual nurses, receptionists, allied health professionals, and other members of staff should be culturally competent. It means that commissioners should be allocating funds according to the needs of our most marginalised communities, ensuring that nobody is left out of the great promise of an NHS for all.

More recently, we are told that the newly established Integrated Care Boards will have responsibility for taking a place-based population health approach to delivering services in an equitable way. The hope is that, by joining up the NHS with Local Authorities and other providers of essential services, we will make it impossible for the needs of marginalised communities to fall through the cracks, as has so often been the case in the past.

Nobody’s job

But what is happening on the ground? Is it realistic to expect NHS leaders to give their limited time and resources to race equity when they are under significantly more pressure to cut costs and reduce waiting times? Is it reasonable to expect members of staff – usually from ethnic minority communities themselves – to give their free time to the cause of achieving race equity?

As the old saying goes, when it’s everybody’s job, it’s nobody’s job. Across the system, we see a phenomenon whereby everyone thinks someone else should be responsible for making a difference. There’s not enough money, our leaders might say, to fund the extra community engagement required to properly cater services to our most vulnerable marginalised communities. I recently met a GP who claimed they would love to spend more time out in their local community fostering trust, but that they were already struggling to keep on top of the rising demand for consultations. And perhaps there wouldn’t be such a need to build this trust at a local level if cultural competence were considered at the outset of public health campaigns.

Part of the issue is accountability. Is anyone really held to account for delivering on race equity in the NHS? It is currently possible for a trust with among the lowest scores on the NHS Workforce Race Equality Standard (WRES) to still be rated ‘Outstanding’ by the Care Quality Commission (CQC). What message does this send to Black, Asian and ethnic minority members of NHS staff? What message does it send to members of the public when leaders are not held to account for the continued poorer outcomes experienced by these communities?

In a similar fashion, the NHS announced in 2020 that each provider organisation in the NHS (including both trusts and ICSs) was required to appoint a board-level accountable lead for health inequalities. In our research on these appointments, we found a huge variation in the levels of support available to these leads, and in the amount of power they felt they had to effect change. Moreover, at a national level, it remains unclear who is responsible for ensuring that these appointments have been made, or who is responsible for holding them to account. This is particularly concerning given the lack of representation among ICS Chairs and Chief Executives.

Most concerningly of all, we have recently seen that the NHS has dropped targets in its planning guidance aimed at ensuring an organisation’s leadership reflected the racial diversity of its workforce.

Moving towards an equity culture

As we have seen repeatedly in the past, we are reaching a point where the NHS is under such significant strain that considerations about equity are becoming an afterthought. When targets around equity are forgotten, so too is the dream of an NHS that serves everyone equally and with dignity.  Exacerbating this is an increasing tendency for efforts to promote equity to be dismissed as ‘wokery’ by some media outlets and politicians.

In truth, equity should be everyone’s responsibility. It should be a fundamental tenet of every job description, policy document and target that the health sector produces. But if equity is ever to be more than a tick-box exercise, it must be embedded in a holistic framework of accountability.

For regulators, this likely means considering their internal processes first – ensuring that their fitness to practise procedures and their role in clinical education are free of bias. Then, it means considering how members of the health and care workforce are encouraged and supported to champion equity in their work, but also how they are held accountable for doing so. What, for example, is the role of revalidation and appraisal in making a difference?

Most importantly of all, we must all look beyond our individual roles and consider how each of us can contribute to a culture of equity. A culture is not just carefully chosen words, or a list of generic ‘values’ on a corporate website. A culture is formed of human interactions and behaviours. A culture is formed when people ask questions, when they listen to the views of others, when they speak out in a meeting, when they recognise their lived experience – privileged or not – may be at polar opposites from others in the room.

Accountability is the start of a journey towards health equity. But an equity culture must be the shared ambition of everyone in our health and care sector if we are to move forward.


Find out more

Read our full report Safer care for all - solutions from professional regulation and beyond  or through chapter 1 -  No more excuses - tackling inequalities. There are also shorter versions available, including the executive summary, you can download these versions here.

Find out more about the NHS Race and Health Observatory here


Get in touch

Contact us if you would like to join the discussion about how we can work together to make health and social care safer for all. You can get in touch by emailing engagement@professionalstandards.org.uk